9-11 WTC Collapses

Fire Engineering has good reason to believe that the "official investigation" blessed by FEMA and run by the American Society of Civil Engineers is a half-baked farce that may already have been commandeered by political forces whose primary interests, to put it mildly, lie far afield of full disclosure. [Fire Engineering - 1/4/2002]

The 9/11 WTC Collapses:
An Audio-Video Analysis

www.whatreallyhappened.com

The foundations for the "War on Terror" lie in the ruins of the World Trade Center. The official account of what occurred on 9/11 is full of inconsistencies, but the mainstream media does not seek explanations. This 9-14-2001 CNN explanation of the collapses demonstrates that absurdity is unquestioned - how can quarter mile high buildings be designed to collapse perfectly in the event of a disaster?

This page goes through some of many inconsistencies in the official story. Grab a cup of coffee and have a read - there are numerous audio and video files in the sub-pages which illustrate the points made. When you've gone through everything ask yourself why the mainstream media avoids these issues.

Click for full sized image

Full index of sub-pages

"Never before in history has a steel high rise building collapsed simply because of fire. On 9/11, by coincidence, three such buildings collapsed in ten to fifteen seconds, almost freefall speed. In other words, if you dropped a brick from the top of the World Trade Center it would have taken about that time to hit the ground."

WMV video download (453kB)

Who Told Giuliani the WTC was going to collapse? [Details]

Rudolph Giuliani, the Police Commissioner, the Fire Commissioner, and the Head of Emergency Management were told that the World Trade Center was going to collapse. How was this known, and why were only a select few warned? UPDATE: The OEM issued the warning.

FEMA was in New York on September 10 [Details]

Pure coincidence?

There Were No 800ºC Infernos in the Twin Towers [Details]

We are told that the twin towers collapsed due to infernos initiated by the plane impacts, yet eyewitness testimony and firefighters broadcasts prove there were no infernos in the buildings, so why did the buildings collapse within minutes of the aircraft impacts?

The Core of WTC 1 was Solid After the Aircraft Impact [Details]

This is proven by a 9/12/2001 interview with a survivor from ABOVE the aircraft impact level.

The 'Truss Theory': A Fantasy Concocted to Conceal a Demolition [Details]

We are told that the twin towers perimeter walls were connected to the inner core by weak trusses. We are also told that the truss connection bolts were weak. If that's the case then why didn't WTC 1 collapse when Flight 11 hit the building?

WTC 1: An Impossible Collapse [Details]

Two seconds of a WTC 1 collapse video graphically demonstrate the 'truss theory' is a fantasy.

Video cameras positioned atop the World Trade Center which were used to feed daily images to local television stations were inexplicably inoperative that morning. [WingTV]

Live video cameras on the WTC would have graphically registered the following...

Abruptly, there was an ear-splitting noise. The south tower shook... [ASNE]

Reports of a Ground Shake
Preceding the Collapse of WTC 2

Video Evidence of a Ground Level
Explosion Prior to WTC 1's Collapse

Seismic recordings, eyewitness testimony, and two videos of WTC 1 indicate a large detonation occurred at the base of the building fourteen seconds before its collapse.

...the probable cause of the above: thermite detonations in the buildings.

9/11 Firefighters: Bombs and Explosions in the WTC [Details]

"Tower two has had major explosion and what appears to be a complete collapse", "...those involved in the secondary explosion at tower 1, 'kay, I've got five patients...", "We have got numerous people covered in dust from the secondary explosion...", "We've got another explosion at the tower..."

"Floor by floor it started popping out."

"It was if they had detonators and they planned to take down a building."

WMV video download (411kB)

Evidence of Demolition Charges in WTC 2

Larry Silverstein, WTC 7, and the 9/11 Demolition [Details]

We are told that WTC 7 collapsed through fire, yet Larry Silverstein says the building was "pulled" (i.e. demolished). Videos of the collapse and other evidence shows that the building was indeed demolished. When and why was this building rigged for demolition?

The FEMA WTC Collapse Analysis Farce [Details]

The BPAT investigation team received $600,000 in FEMA funding, a drop in the ocean compared to the $50 million set aside for the NASA investigation of the Columbia shuttle disaster. The BPAT team took more than 3 weeks to initiate an investigation of WTC debris meaning vital evidence was lost.

If the twin towers had remained standing on 9/11 (as they were supposed to) they would have been monuments to the inaction of the US government and military. These monuments would have rapidly become a huge embarrassment to many people, and would have required a costly demolition.

Incredibly these two quarter mile high buildings both suffered catastrophic structural failures and collapsed straight into their own footprints. The people who should have been red faced bankrupts as a result of 9/11 are now swimming in money and power thanks to the perfect collapse of the twin towers.

Think about it.

The 9/11 Reichstag Fire

"If you've seen many of the managed demolitions where they implode a building and they cause it to essentially to fall vertically because they cause all of the vertical columns to fail simultaneously, that's exactly what it looked like and that's what happened" - Matthys Levy, co author Why buildings Fall Down

WMV video download (524kB)

“When you eliminate the impossible, whatever remains--however improbable--must be the truth.”
Sir Arthur Conan Doyle